Teeworlds Forum — 0.5.0 progress

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (Chi11y) — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:22:48 +0000

This thread has done its, stop asking about release dates, you'll notice when 0.5 is released.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (rafaolisan) — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:08:22 +0000

What do u think about a gosme weapon

Like a mix of granade launch and laser

Thx

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (warstorm) — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:56:10 +0000

this is turning to be offtop:)
ok, two years ago i decided to see, how looks this new game. Through many of locations from physics there was only "gravity" and no falling barrels with collisions(for example). As i tried to see something really good in that game, teeworlds is best ^^, but have places for adding interactivity, because even in flag mode, gameplay sometimes looks... monotonous. Altough, as a good game, it should leave time for work:)
ps: anyway, something like counter-strike 1.6 could be more casual for example... and (please) dont say about powerfull physics in this game )))) or compare with havok...

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (gordzo70@hotmail.com) — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:08:03 +0000

warstorm wrote:

ouch, yes)

What game were you talking about then? Link please

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (warstorm) — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:03:45 +0000

ouch, yes)

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (gordzo70@hotmail.com) — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:33:57 +0000

warstorm wrote:

gordzo70@hotmail.com wrote:
And are you saying that the physics capabilities of the STALKER engine are bad/poor? You're dreamin'.
and stalker hasnt any physics at all.

Not at all you say? Then what is this: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=hqfgs4iBRHE

However, we might be talking about different STALKERs.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (warstorm) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:48:50 +0000

good physics is not extensive graphics:)
there is nothing impossible for really good young heads! and this is more cute(and complex) than teleports, which could be source of many problems. landscape of map will be changing interactively, more and more funny situations will happen. Various natural effects such as friction, collision, (gravity, of course:), Archimed's force, airwaves, [rain and snow(graphics)]... mmmm... It's that i'll ready to pay for. To be honest, i tried to create a clone of teewars on top of the HGE 2D-engine, but it really needs about eternity of time:)

gordzo70@hotmail.com wrote:

What do you mean improve the physics? There aren't any to start off with really.

i know:)

gordzo70@hotmail.com wrote:

And are you saying that the physics capabilities of the STALKER engine are bad/poor? You're dreamin'.

and stalker hasnt any physics at all.

gordzo70@hotmail.com wrote:

What will a barrel add to Teeworlds? Nothing?

its just example!)

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (torch) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:47:31 +0000

You can have all the shiny cpu extensive graphics in your game, but if your idea is poor ie. not original, just another fps, etc etc then your game wont make it to the top.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (Hooker) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:29:15 +0000

warstorm wrote:

Hi2all! If i were on developers place, first of all i'll try to improve physics in this game, because now it looks like physics in Stalker or HL-one - nothing(sorry me:) Please, add more interactivity with objects without anchor, such as barrels, ... ) and objects with scripts (there is a test for your imagination:8). Graphically, there is some place to use shaders(i'm newbie in CG&game-dev, but what about motion blur?), but with HDR...oO this effect should be used very-very-very accurately! It would be funny to see a gun, shooting with little balls, on which we could skating/sliding... I'm not one, not first with these ideas(all my searches fault)? Please, answer. Sorry4my English:)

If you were developer, you wouldn't be able to do this

And just by the way, teeworlds is just a little project of some young people with a good head, so relax, think about feautures we really need now (like death and teleport tiles) and watch how teeworlds evolves

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (gordzo70@hotmail.com) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:12:11 +0000

warstorm wrote:

Hi2all! If i were on developers place, first of all i'll try to improve physics in this game, because now it looks like physics in Stalker or HL-one - nothing(sorry me:) Please, add more interactivity with objects without anchor, such as barrels, ... ) and objects with scripts (there is a test for your imagination:8). Graphically, there is some place to use shaders(i'm newbie in CG&game-dev, but what about motion blur?), but with HDR...oO this effect should be used very-very-very accurately! It would be funny to see a gun, shooting with little balls, on which we could skating/sliding... I'm not one, not first with these ideas(all my searches fault)? Please, answer. Sorry4my English:)

Refreshing post

What do you mean improve the physics? There aren't any to start off with really. And are you saying that the physics capabilities of the STALKER engine are bad/poor? You're dreamin'.

What will a barrel add to Teeworlds? Nothing?

A HDR-like effect has been kind of brought up in one of the blogs.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (shmafoozius) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:19:34 +0000

Uh... shiny HDR effects don't fit Teeworlds at all.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (warstorm) — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:11:46 +0000

Hi2all! If i were on developers place, first of all i'll try to improve physics in this game, because now it looks like physics in Stalker or HL-one - nothing(sorry me:) Please, add more interactivity with objects without anchor, such as barrels, ... ) and objects with scripts (there is a test for your imagination:8). Graphically, there is some place to use shaders(i'm newbie in CG&game-dev, but what about motion blur?), but with HDR...oO this effect should be used very-very-very accurately! It would be funny to see a gun, shooting with little balls, on which we could skating/sliding... I'm not one, not first with these ideas(all my searches fault)? Please, answer. Sorry4my English:)

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (Mecha-Kirby) — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:31:51 +0000

teetow wrote:

Damn straight, Mecha-Kirby. We are, as you all know, aging men with a sadistic streak who can crush binary data with our bare hands.

It was just an example... (btw: The Card Crusher was a good thing to show it.)

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (teetow) — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:47:53 +0000

Damn straight, Mecha-Kirby. We are, as you all know, aging men with a sadistic streak who can crush binary data with our bare hands.

Re: 0.5.0 progress

null@example.com (Mecha-Kirby) — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:35:42 +0000

btw: If you kiddies still asking "when it does come out", this might be happen.